mashniom.blogg.se

Yates v. checkers
Yates v. checkers





Still no ChessBase Account? learn more > Sac, sac, mate! Solve tactical positions of your playing strength.Store your games, training material and opening repertoire in the cloud. Still no ChessBase Account? learn more > My Games – Access your games from everywhere.Still no ChessBase Account? learn more > 8 million games online! Updated weekly, our definitive database has all the latest games.The Padua Inventory-Revised (41-items) appears to measure the structure of obsessive compulsive symptoms: The main types of behaviours and obsessions as seen clinically are assessed by this questionnaire, apart from obsessional slowness. Some evidence in support of the construct validity was found. The Impulses subscale discriminated between obsessive-compulsives on the one hand and normals on the other, but not between obsessive-compulsives and social phobics or panic patients.

yates v. checkers

Four subscales (washing, checking, rumination and precision) discriminated between panic disorder patients, social phobics and normals on the one hand and obsessive compulsives on the other. The reliability for the five subscales, assessing each of the five factors, was found to be satisfactory to excellent. Forty-one items were selected as measure of these factors. These factors are: (I) impulses (II) washing (III) checking (IV) rumination and (V) precision. Simultaneous Components Analysis on data from obsessive-compulsives (n = 206), patients with other anxiety disorders (n = 222), and a non clinical sample (n = 430) revealed a five-factor solution. In the present study, the structure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms was investigated by means of the Padua Inventory (PI).







Yates v. checkers